Premium Intraocular Lenses: A Framework for Patient Selection and Expectation Management

Auteurs-es

  • Kelly Ann Hutchinson
  • Jamie Bhamra

Résumé

Cataract extraction with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is among the most performed and safest operations in ophthalmology. In Canada, cataract surgery demand is projected to more than double over the next 25 years, driven by population aging. As surgical volumes rise, parallel advances in IOL design have expanded the range of postoperative visual outcomes that can be offered. Modern IOLs vary substantially in optical strategy and performance profile, each offering distinct benefits, compromises, and contraindications. This expanding landscape has made preoperative counselling more complex. Many patients arrive having prior exposure to information on “premium lenses” from online sources or through friends and family, information that can be helpful, but is often incomplete, inaccurate, or not tailored to their ocular status. A surgeon-led approach that is standardized yet individualized can improve clarity and help align patient expectations with realistic surgical outcomes.

Many practices further streamline counselling by adopting a team-based approach that incorporates a dedicated surgical coordinator as part of the preoperative pathway. After the surgeon has assessed candidacy and discussed clinically appropriate IOL categories, the coordinator then meets with the patient to reinforce lens education and operationalize the plan. This role typically includes explaining IOL function in practical terms, outlining pricing and any surgeon recommendations, discussing payment options and financing, completing consent and administrative documentation, and coordinating appointments alongside pre- and postoperative instructions. In addition to improving efficiency and reducing repetition across visits, this structure helps separate the clinical decision (what is safest and most appropriate) from the financial conversation (how elective upgrades are funded), which can reduce perceived pressure and support patient trust. In a pragmatic workflow, the initial visit therefore concludes with the coordinator reviewing consent, confirming waitlist placement and expected timelines, measurement planning for IOL calculations, reinforcing key counselling points (including the importance of ocular surface optimization for accurate biometry), and providing a clear summary of the selected pathway and associated costs.

Biographies de l'auteur-e

Kelly Ann Hutchinson

Kelly Ann Hutchinson is currently an ophthalmology resident at Queen’s University. She previously completed medical school at McGill University, earned a Master of Science at the University of Ottawa, and obtained a Bachelor of Science from Florida International University, where she competed on the NCAA Division I women’s soccer team.

Jamie Bhamra

Dr. Jamie Bhamra, an Associate Professor and Ophthalmologist in Calgary, specializes in cataract, anterior segment, ocular surface, refractive and corneal surgery. He trained at prestigious institutions in Canada and the United States, and focuses on kind, compassionate care, and advanced intraocular lens technologies. With a keen interest in research, Dr. Bhamra has contributed significantly to ophthalmology, particularly in corneal procedures, ocular surface inflammation and innovative treatments. He actively helps train residents and engages in international outreach programs, providing essential eye care worldwide. Outside medicine, he enjoys fitness, hanging out with amazing family, sports, travel, coaching and mindfulness practices, reflecting a well-rounded dedication to both professional excellence and personal well‑being and fulfillment.

Références

Micieli JA, Arshinoff SA. Cataract surgery. CMAJ. 2011;183(14):1621. doi:10.1503/cmaj.110549

Chen SP, Woreta F, Chang DF. Cataracts: a review. JAMA. 2025;333(23):2093–2103. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.1597

Popovic MM, Hurst M, Diemert LM, Chu C, Yang M, El-Defrawy S, et al. A retrospective population-based analysis of wait times for cataract surgery in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ Open. 2023;11(2):E329–E335. Published 2023 Apr 18. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20220035

Chen JL, Al-Mohtaseb ZN, Chen AJ. Criteria for premium intraocular lens patient selection. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2024;35(5):353–358. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000001067

Khandelwal SS, Jun JJ, Mak S, Booth MS, Shekelle PG. Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257(5):863–875. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6

Liu J, Dong Y, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019;19(1):198. Published 2019 Sep 2. doi:10.1186/s12886-019-1204-0

Braga-Mele R, Chang D, Dewey S, Foster G, Henderson BA, Hill W, et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: relative indications and contraindications for implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(2):313–322. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.011

Yeu E, Cuozzo S. Matching the patient to the intraocular lens: preoperative considerations to optimize surgical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(11):e132–e141. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.025

Newman-Casey PA, Ravilla S, Haripriya A, Palanichamy V, Pillai M, Balakrishnan V, et al. The effect of counseling on cataract patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and satisfaction. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015;22(6):387–393. doi:10.3109/09286586.2015.1066016

Choi AR, Greenberg PB. Patient education strategies in cataract surgery: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2018;11(2):71–82. doi:10.1111/jebm.12297

Starr CE, Gupta PK, Farid M, Beckman KA, Chan CC, Yeu E, et al. An algorithm for the preoperative diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disorders. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(5):669–684. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.03.023

Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ, Malhotra RP, Potvin R. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1672–1677. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016

Hinnig RB, Martins LFS, Penha FM. Spectral domain oct for screening of macular diseases prior to multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2022;8(1):77. doi:10.1186/s40942-022-00427-8

Téléchargements

Publié

2026-05-12

Comment citer

1.
Premium Intraocular Lenses: A Framework for Patient Selection and Expectation Management. Can Eye Care Today [Internet]. 12 mai 2026 [cité 13 mai 2026];5(1):12–18. Disponible à: https://canadianeyecaretoday.com/article/view/5-1-Hutchinson_et_al

Numéro

Rubrique

Articles

Comment citer

1.
Premium Intraocular Lenses: A Framework for Patient Selection and Expectation Management. Can Eye Care Today [Internet]. 12 mai 2026 [cité 13 mai 2026];5(1):12–18. Disponible à: https://canadianeyecaretoday.com/article/view/5-1-Hutchinson_et_al