Refractive surgery for myopia: review of options and the decision-making process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58931/cect.2022.1317Abstract
Many options now exist for patients seeking surgical correction of myopia. The challenge lies in selecting the right procedure for the right patient. This article provides an overview of current refractive surgery options and discusses the clinical and imaging considerations in decision-making.
References
Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(5):925-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00059-2
Tole DM, McCarty DJ, Couper T, Taylor HR. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of -6.00 diopters or less. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group. J Refract Surg. 2001;17(1):46-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20010101-06
Van Gelder RN, Steger-May K, Yang SH, Rattanatam T, Pepose JS. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(3):462-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01177-4
Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Boxer Wachler BS, Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(7):1249-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.010
Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRETTO WAVE: three-month results of a prospective FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(4):S424-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20080401-20
Stulting RD, Fant BS, Bond W, Chotiner B, Durrie D, Gordon M, et al. Results of topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis custom ablation treatment with a refractive excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):11-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.016
Vestergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, Hjortdal J. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia: Predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(11):2003-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.021
Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(4):248-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03
Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(3):335-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.174284
Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Femtosecond LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(6):724-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.006
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(7):454-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130617-03
Li M, Niu L, Qin B, Zhou Z, Ni K, Le Q, et al. Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081435
Ma KK, Manche EE. Corneal Sensitivity and Patient-Reported Dry Eye Symptoms in a Prospective Randomized Contralateral-Eye Trial Comparing LASIK and SMILE. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.05.010
Brar S, Roopashree CR, Ganesh S. Incidence of Ectasia After SMILE From a High-Volume Refractive Surgery Center in India. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(12):800-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20210812-03
Randleman JB. Ectasia After SMILE, Revisited. J Refract Surg. 2021;37(12):798-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20211025-01
Khalifa MA, Ghoneim A, Shafik Shaheen M, Aly MG, Piñero DP. Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of SMILE and Wavefront-Guided LASIK in Low and Moderate Myopia. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(5):298-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170222-01
Kanellopoulos AJ. Topography-Guided LASIK versus Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Long-term Refractive and Quality of Vision Outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1658-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.006
Chiang B, Valerio GS, Manche EE. Prospective, Randomized Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Refractive Surgeries. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;237:211-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.11.013
Siedlecki J, Luft N, Priglinger SG, Dirisamer M. Enhancement Options After Myopic Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE): A Review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019;8(5):406-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000259
Barraquer JI. Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1966;6(1):53-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-196606010-00004
Fleming JF, Wan WL, Schanzlin DJ. The theory of corneal curvature change with the Intrastromal Corneal Ring. CLAO J. 1989;15(2):146-50.
Addition Technology, Inc. Professional Use Information Manual for Correction of Myopia with Intacs(R) Corneal Implants: Physician Booklet. 2005.
Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, Farjo AA, Majmudar PA, Trattler WB, et al. Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(11):2244-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.018
Srinivasan B, Leung HY, Cao H, Liu S, Chen L, Fan AH. Modern Phacoemulsification and Intraocular Lens Implantation (Refractive Lens Exchange) Is Safe and Effective in Treating High Myopia. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016;5(6):438-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000241
Alió JL, Grzybowski A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it? Eye Vis (Lond). 2014;1:10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-014-0010-2
Salz J, Trattler WB. Patient Evaluation and Selection in Refractive Surgery. In: Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, editors. Cornea. 2. 5th ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2021:1666-73.
Sorkin N, Perez Velasquez MA, Rootman DS. Excimer Laser Surface Treatment: Photorefractive Keratectomy. In: Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, editors. Cornea. 2. 5th ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2021:1682-94.
Shah R. History and Results; Indications and Contraindications of SMILE Compared With LASIK. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019;8(5):371-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.APO.0000580132.98159.fa
Brar S, Gautam M, Sute SS, Ganesh S. Refractive surgery with simultaneous collagen cross-linking for borderline corneas – A review of different techniques, their protocols and clinical outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68(12):2744-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1709_20
Lim EWL, Lim L. Review of Laser Vision Correction (LASIK, PRK and SMILE) with Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking – Long-term Results. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(11):1171-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2019.1656749
Piñero DP. Misdiagnosing Keratoconus. Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2016;11(1):29-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/17469899.2016.1136215
Hwang ES, Schallhorn JM, Randleman JB. Utility of regional epithelial thickness measurements in corneal evaluations. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020;65(2):187-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.09.003
Zhu AY, Jun AS, Soiberman US. Combined Protocols for Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking with Photorefractive Surgery for Refractive Management of Keratoconus: Update on Techniques and Review of Literature. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8(Suppl 1):15-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-019-00210-3
Kymionis GD, Grentzelos MA, Kounis GA, Diakonis VF, Limnopoulou AN, Panagopoulou SI. Combined transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(9):1777-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.038
Kapasi M, Dhaliwal A, Mintsioulis G, Jackson WB, Baig K. Long-Term Results of Phototherapeutic Keratectomy Versus Mechanical Epithelial Removal Followed by Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Keratoconus. Cornea. 2016;35(2):157-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000679
Stein R. Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy. In: Mannis MJ, Holland EJ, editors. Cornea. 5th ed. Canada: Elsevier; 2021:1757-64.
Iqbal M, Elmassry A, Tawfik A, Elgharieb M, Nagy K, Soliman A, et al. Standard cross-linking versus photorefractive keratectomy combined with accelerated cross-linking for keratoconus management: a comparative study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(4):e623-e31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13986
Singal N, Ong Tone S, Stein R, Bujak MC, Chan CC, Chew HF, et al. Comparison of accelerated CXL alone, accelerated CXL-ICRS, and accelerated CXL-TG-PRK in progressive keratoconus and other corneal ectasias. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(2):276-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000049
Adib-Moghaddam S, Soleyman-Jahi S, Salmanian B, Omidvari AH, Adili-Aghdam F, Noorizadeh F, et al. Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in myopia and astigmatism: 18-month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(11):1570-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.029
Luger MH, Ewering T, Arba-Mosquera S. Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(11):1579-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.025
Rapuano CJ, Sugar A, Koch DD, Agapitos PJ, Culbertson WW, de Luise VP, et al. Intrastromal corneal ring segments for low myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(10):1922-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00804-1
Stulting RD, John ME, Maloney RK, Assil KK, Arrowsmith PN, Thompson VM. Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation. Results of the United States Food And Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(3):464-72.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.039
Sanders DR, Doney K, Poco M. United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: three-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(9):1683-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.026
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Canadian Eye Care Today
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
