The evolving role of OCT in pathologic myopia

Authors

  • Mark Greve, MD, FRCSC
  • Mark Seamone, MD, FRCSC
  • Carl Shen, MD, FRCSC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58931/cect.2022.115

Abstract

The global burden of myopia represents a significant public health concern that is expected to continue to increase in the near future. It is estimated that 50% of the world’s population will be affected by myopia by 2050, with a disproportionately high prevalence in Asia. High myopia, where the spherical equivalent refractive error is equal to or higher than 6.00 diopters, is expected to increase in prevalence from 2.7% to 10% during this period. The severity of myopia is of paramount concern to clinicians as higher levels are associated with pathologic myopia (PM) and increased risk of vision loss. Pathologic myopia, as recently defined by the International Myopia Institute, is an excessive axial elongation associated with myopia that leads to structural changes in the posterior segment of the eye that can lead to loss of best-corrected visual acuity. These structural changes and their complications include posterior staphyloma, myopic choroidal neovascularization, myopic maculopathy, myopic traction maculopathy, dome shaped maculopathy, optic disc changes and glaucoma associated with myopia, and retinal detachments.

The advent of optical coherence tomography (OCT) has facilitated the characterization, diagnosis, and management of several of these complications associated with PM and will be the focus of this article. Imaging the highly myopic eye represents a crucial step in the identification of these complications and poses its own unique challenges. Researchers have demonstrated the advantage of 3D cube scans in the detection of pathology compared to 1- and 5-line rasters. Using vertical scanning patterns aligning where the radius of curvature is larger relative to the horizontal plane of the myopic eye can minimize associated artifacts. Wide scans, facilitated by emerging technologies such as swept- source OCT and ultra wide-field OCT, are useful in cases of PM where the pathology can initiate peripherally.

Author Biographies

Mark Greve, MD, FRCSC

Dr. Mark Greve attended and received his Doctor of Medicine in 1983–1988 from the University of Saskatchewan. He then began his Ophthalmology Residency in 1988, at the University of Saskatchewan, completing his Residency in 1992. Dr. Greve spent the next two years, till 1994, completing his Medical/Surgical Retina Fellowship at Louisiana State University. Dr. Greve is currently an Associate Clinical Professor with the University of Alberta and is Chief of Vitreoretinal Surgery.

Mark Seamone, MD, FRCSC

Dr. Mark Seamone completed a 4-year BSc in Biology at Acadia University. Following his undergraduate, he completed a MSc in Immunology and his Doctor of Medicine as a member of the Leaders in Medicine Program, University of Calgary. He then completed a 5-year Ophthalmology residency at Dalhousie University. Dr. Seamone concluded his training by completing a 2-year medical and surgical Vitreoretinal fellowship at the University of Alberta. He is a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. He is an Assistant Clinical Professor in the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alberta, and serves as the Fellowship Director for the University of Alberta Vitreoretinal Fellowship Program.

Carl Shen, MD, FRCSC

Dr. Carl Shen completed his Bachelor of Medical Sciences at Western University followed by his Doctorate of Medicine from the University of Toronto and subsequent residency training in ophthalmology at McMaster University. He is currently completing his vitreo-retinal fellowship at the University of Alberta.

References

Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036-1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006

Flitcroft DI, He M, Jonas JB, et al. IMI – Defining and Classifying Myopia: A Proposed Set of Standards for Clinical and Epidemiologic Studies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(3):M20-M30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25957

Sayanagi K, Morimoto Y, Ikuno Y, Tano Y. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic findings in myopic foveoschisis. Retina. 2010;30(4):623-628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181ca4e7c

Ohno-Matsui K, Fang Y, Shinohara K, Takahashi H, Uramoto K, Yokoi T. Imaging of Pathologic Myopia. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol (Philadelphia, Pa). 2019;8(2):172-177.

Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, Carter G, Mitchell P. Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010

Milani P, Pece A, Pierro L, Bergamini F. Imaging of naive myopic choroidal neovascularization by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmologica. 2014;232(1):28-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000357980

Lai TYY, Cheung CMG. Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Diagnosis and Treatment. Retina. 2016;36(9):1614-1621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001227

Zicarelli F, Azzolini C, Cornish E, et al. Optical coherence tomography features of choroidal neovascularization and their correlation with age, gender, and underlying disease. Retina. 2021;41(5):1076-1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002984

Leveziel N, Caillaux V, Bastuji-Garin S, Zmuda M, Souied EH. Angiographic and optical coherence tomography characteristics of recent myopic choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(5):913- 919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.11.021

Iacono P, Giorno P, Varano M, Parravano M. Structural and optical coherence tomography angiography in myopic choroidal neovascularization: Agreement with conventional fluorescein angiography. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(1):149-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672119882333

Miyata M, Ooto S, Hata M, et al. Detection of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;165:108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.03.009

Battista M, Sacconi R, Borrelli E, et al. Discerning Between Macular Hemorrhages Due to Macular Neovascularization or Due to Spontaneous Bruch’s Membrane Rupture in High Myopia: A Comparative Analysis Between OCTA and Fluorescein Angiography. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11(2):821-831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-022-00484-0

Introini U, Casalino G, Querques G, Gimeno AT, Scotti F, Bandello F. Spectral-domain OCT in anti-VEGF treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization. Eye (Lond). 2012;26(7):976-982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.75

Bruyère E, Caillaux V, Cohen SY, et al. Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography of Subretinal Hyperreflective Exudation in Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(4):749-758.e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.07.004

Ikuno Y, Jo Y, Hamasaki T, Tano Y. Ocular risk factors for choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(7):3721-3725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-3493

Ahn SJ, Park KH, Woo SJ. Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness Changes Following Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(10):5794-5800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-16006

Panozzo G, Mercanti A. Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill 1960). 2004;122(10):1455-1460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.10.1455

Parolini B, Palmieri M, Finzi A, et al. The new Myopic Traction Maculopathy Staging System. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(3):1299-1312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120930590

Shimada N, Tanaka Y, Tokoro T, Ohno-Matsui K. Natural course of myopic traction maculopathy and factors associated with progression or resolution. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.031

Ripandelli G, Rossi T, Scarinci F, Scassa C, Parisi V, Stirpe M. Macular vitreoretinal interface abnormalities in highly myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma: 5-year follow-up. Retina. 2012;32(8):1531-1538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e318255062c

Jo Y, Ikuno Y, Nishida K. Retinoschisis: a predictive factor in vitrectomy for macular holes without retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(2):197-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2011.203232

Sborgia G, Boscia F, Niro A, et al. Morphologic and functional outcomes of different optical coherence tomography patterns of myopic foveoschisis after vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(11):1768-1775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0490-3

Grewal PS, Lapere SRJ, Gupta RR, Greve M. Macular buckle without vitrectomy for myopic macular schisis: a Canadian case series. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(1):60-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.02.014

Alkabes M, Mateo C. Macular buckle technique in myopic traction maculopathy: a 16-year review of the literature and a comparison with vitreous surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(5):863- 877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-3947-3

Grewal PS, Seamone M, Greve M, Deveau A, Gupta RR. Internal Chandelier-Assisted Macular Buckling for Myopic Foveoschisis. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2020;Publish Ah.

Bruyère E, Philippakis E, Dupas B, Nguyen-Kim P, Tadayoni R, Couturier A. Benefit of interoperative optical coherence tomography for vitreomacular surgery in highly myopic eyes. Retina. 2018;38(10):2035-2044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001827

Parolini B, Palmieri M, Finzi A, Frisina R. Proposal for the management of myopic traction maculopathy based on the new MTM staging system. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(6):3265-3276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120980943

Ohno-Matsui K, Kawasaki R, Jonas JB, et al. International photographic classification and grading system for myopic maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(5):877-883.e7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.022

Fang Y, Yokoi T, Nagaoka N, et al. Progression of Myopic Maculopathy during 18-Year Follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(6):863- 877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.005

Fang Y, Du R, Nagaoka N, et al. OCT-Based Diagnostic Criteria for Different Stages of Myopic Maculopathy. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(7):1018-1032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.01.012

Published

2022-06-01

How to Cite

1.
Greve M, Seamone M, Shen C. The evolving role of OCT in pathologic myopia. Can Eye Care Today [Internet]. 2022 Jun. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 3];1(1):8–13. Available from: https://canadianeyecaretoday.com/article/view/1-1-1

Issue

Section

Articles